Letter: Why angling is off the hook as a cruel sport

Mr James Barrington
Thursday 30 December 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: J. A. Charman (letter, 29 December) likens fishing to foxhunting and wonders why the League Against Cruel Sports does not campaign against the former. Quite simply, the average angler partakes in the activity either to eat the catch or replace the fish, as in coarse fishing.

Compare this with hunting, in which the fox is likely to be chased to an underground refuge, dug out over a period possibly lasting hours and finally shot, or clubbed to death with a spade. Most normal people will see a vast difference. They will also recognise a rather desperate attempt by the foxhunting fraternity to justify their so-called sport.

A far more relevant question, in my view, relates to the digging out of foxes using terriers and the illegal act of digging out badgers in the same manner. Why is one perfectly acceptable to the hunting fraternity and the other not?

Yours faithfully,

JAMES BARRINGTON

Executive Director

League Against Cruel Sports

London, SE1

29 December

(Photographs omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in