Letter: Who will join an identity parade?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: It is nonsense to say that Michael Howard neutralised objections to a compulsory identification card by indicating that it would be voluntary (leading article, 14 October). Surely it is obvious that any compulsory card would be initially introduced as voluntary and then made compulsory when an adequate portion of the population had one. You make no mention of any government undertaking that the card would permanently remain voluntary. And given the present government's record on keeping promises, it would be worthless if if it did do so.
This measure is about information and the control of information. While we have a government that continues to keep tight control on its own information and extends its rights to pry on the ordinary citizen, the status of this country as a democracy is increasingly dubious.
Yours sincerely, IAN MILLER Cambridge 14 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments