Letter:Who owns Bart's?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Further to Andreas Whittam Smith's article ("Is Bart's saved?", 27 May), I would like to pose another question: "Who owns Bart's?"
In 1948 the National Health Service acquired the deeds of the hospital without money changing hands, in return for continuing to provide a health service on the site, as had previously been provided by Bart's Trustees and Governors.
Why cannot the deeds now be handed to the Royal Hospital of St Bartholomew Charitable Foundation? They are prepared to offer a health service on the site in line with the wishes of the original founding Charter which donated the site and the means to maintain the hospital.
Surely, since the Department of Health are to withdraw from supplying hospital treatment at St Bartholomew's Hospital, they do not have a right to the site.
SHEILA JONES
London EC2
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments