Letter: Who'll give the young fair hearings?

Ms Mary Honeyball
Thursday 25 August 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Your leading article ('Young devils and little angels: the facts', 24 August) is correct to identify popular misconceptions about the extent and severity of juvenile offending that have been fostered by some politicians and journalists.

In the last few years there has been a noticeable trend to greater intolerance towards children, while the more reassuring facts about their offending patterns has been drowned out by torrents of rhetoric. Persistent offenders are routinely rechristened with unhelpful nicknames like 'Ratboy' and debate, both in the tabloid press and in Parliament, relies on terms like 'lout', 'thug' and 'scum'.

For young people, law and order being on the top of the political agenda has been very dangerous. For the minor offender on the fringe of criminality, cautioning has now been curtailed, despite its success rate. For the more persistent offender, under proposed legislation, looms the grim threat of the Secure Training Order in a privately run 'teen prison', where reconviction rates are likely to be 85 per cent or more.

The exhortation by the Prime Minister to condemn a little more and understand a little less has only assisted in this. Now, however good you may be, it is often not good enough to get a fair hearing. The facts can speak for themselves, but seldom loudly enough.

Yours sincerely,

MARY HONEYBALL

General Secretary, Association of Chief Officers of Probation

London, E1

24 August

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in