Letter: Who benefits from the assisted places scheme?

Professor Joan Freeman
Thursday 21 December 1995 20:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: It is a particular feature of follow-up studies that they take some years to do. David Woodhead, national director of the Independent Schools Service, takes me (and Professor Peter Saunders of Sussex University) to task (Another View, 21 December) because the research on the effects of private and state schools began with a sample who were born 40 years ago - but the findings that showed little difference in adult outcome were this year's.

My concern about the pounds 105m spent on Assisted Places was based on independent research, not, as he says, "assertions". I refer to the dedicated study published in 1989, The State and Private Education: an Evaluation of the assisted places scheme by Tony Edwards, John Fitz and Geoff Whitty (Falmer Press). It states clearly that fewer than 10 per cent of the selected children had fathers who were manual workers, compared with 50 per cent in service-class occupations such as teaching, and that although children from single-parent families made up the largest category, other disadvantaged groups, notably the unemployed, and black and Asian families, had poor representation. They also found that two-thirds of those taking up places for the first time at 16 were already fee-paying pupils in the same school.

Of course, there is always the possibility that things have changed beyond recognition in the past few years, though that remains to be seen. But, most importantly, we do not know how those Assisted Places pupils would have fared had they not gone to private schools, but to good comprehensives instead. After all, they were chosen because they were extremely bright, well motivated and from supportive families. At best, the assisted places scheme remains unproven; at worst, it is a misdirection of educational funds.

Yours faithfully,

Joan Freeman

London, W1

21 December

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in