Letter: Whitehall's role in regional decline
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your leading article ('England's regional identity problem', 4 November) draws attention to the conspicuous absence of regional government in Britain. It is not identity that is lacking, but representation. Today the Government announced that ministers will assume a regional brief in addition to their departmental duties. Apart from the inevitable clash of interests, the undemocratic relationship between minister and region will prevent any devolution of decision-making or any claim to representation.
Power will remain firmly in Whitehall. This is not subsidiarity in either the British or European sense.
The lack of regional political institutions is matched by the ineffectiveness of those that exist to serve the national interest. This has been highlighted by the passage of the Railways Privatisation Bill. The House of Lords would have precipitated a 'full-scale constitutional crisis' ('Peers obstruct BR sell-off', 4 November) had it continued to do the job it is there for.
Our recent study of ways to reform the House of Lords concludes that the only way to strengthen its contribution to the legislative process is to 'legitimise' its membership. Were the second chamber to be elected by regional constituencies, bills could be properly amended and improved, and the Government would not need to allocate regional responsibilities among ministers in this arbitrary fashion.
Yours faithfully,
ANNE DAVIES
Research Fellow
Institute for Public Policy
Research
London, WC2
4 November
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments