Letter: Whitehall confusion
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I read the front-page article 'Whitehall in crisis' (15 November) with an increasing sense of disbelief. Did this really represent the thoughts of the same Sir Peter Kemp who, when in charge of contracting out in the Civil Service, refused a review of the process to ascertain whether the exercise was delivering what was claimed for it, or just 'cost cutting?'
Was it the same Sir Peter who told me that the duties of confidentiality and loyal service which a civil servant owes the Crown were for 'all practical purposes owed' to the government of the day?
Was it, indeed, the same Sir Peter who could have introduced contracts for the top ranks of civil servants, as indeed he did for agency chief executives, but whose own departure then proved contracts would be unnecessarily expensive as ministers can and do get rid of civil servants when they choose?
It seems that there is confusion; but whether it is confined solely to those who still serve in Whitehall is a matter of debate. What is clear, however, is that the judgement of Vernon Bogdanor, reader in government at Oxford University, in calling for a Royal Commission on the civil service, is right.
Yours sincerely,
ELIZABETH SYMONS
General Secretary
The Association of First
Division Civil Servants
London, SW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments