Letter: When the sentence is a second assault
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: It is a disturbingly naive assumption that a pounds 500 holiday can help a child to overcome the damaging effects of a serious sexual assault such as rape ('Judges also need reviewing'; leading article, 9 February). I would like to place this individual decision in a wider context of the sentencing guidelines on incest (Attorney General Reference 1, 1989) to which you refer in your article.
The guidelines laid down by the then Lord Chief Justice are based on a number of mistaken and dangerous assumptions about sexual abuse and sex offending behaviour. The guidelines, for example, refer to a number of mitigating factors which should be taken into account when sentencing the abuser. These include genuine affection displayed on the part of the defendant, and where the victim has had previous sexual
experience. We know from clinical research and experience that the closeness of relationship between a victim and the abuser often results in a greater betrayal of trust and has more harmful consequences for the victim. To use the child's previous sexual experience as a mitigating factor in sentencing the abuser is implicitly to blame the child for the abuser's actions.
We would urge that the sentencing guidelines on incest are now reviewed and that the judiciary are provided with the training to help them understand sexual abuse and the reality of sex-offending behaviour.
Yours faithfully,
CHRISTOPHER BROWN
Director
The National Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children
London, EC1
10 February
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments