Letter: When pupils accuse teachers of abuse

Mr Nigel de Gruchy
Friday 15 April 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Beatrix Campbell's article 'Now even teachers crusade against children' (13 April) shows deep ignorance of what the teacher unions have been doing on the difficult subject of child abuse. The NASUWT has played a leading role in bringing together all the other teacher unions, the local education authorities, the police, the Crown Prosecution Service and social services in an attempt to hammer out procedures which are fair to teachers and children.

If the events Ms Campbell describes in West Yorkshire are true, then it is the fault of the school and the police that the teacher concerned was not dismissed and brought to court. All the NASUWT has said is that teachers should not be suspended on the say-so of just one child. If people are to be suspended, and prosecuted in court on the basis of uncorroborated evidence then serious violations of natural justice will be perpetrated.

For every case that Beatrix Campbell quotes, I could cite a dozen more where children have made malicious accusations, in some instances being expelled and transferred to other schools, and subsequently repeating the same offence.

In many instances, the children have eventually confessed to making false and malicious accusations. Ms Campbell has nothing to say about the devastating effects false accusations have on the family - including the children - of the teachers concerned.

The NASUWT has repeatedly stated that it does not wish to protect the guilty from justice. You do not achieve that by adopting the nave proposal suggested by Beatrix Campbell, which would continue to expose teachers to the capricious malice of a small but unfortunately increasing number of children.

Yours faithfully,

NIGEL de GRUCHY

General Secretary

NASUWT

London, WC2

13 April

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in