Letter: When lesbian meant monster
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.IT IS NOT so surprising that, despite her affairs with women, Daphne du Maurier was contemptuous of lesbians ('Daphne's dilemma', Review, 14 March). It was only at the end of the last century, with the growing independence of middle-class women and an increasing awareness of sex in general, that lesbians were identified variously as psychotic perverts, a monstrous 'third sex' and a threat to the structure of society. Many early 20th-century women, unable to see a connection between these images and their own passionate relationships with women, must have assumed 'lesbians' were 'other people'.
Catherine Treasure
London NW2
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments