LETTER : When is a sin not a sin in the varying religions of the 20th century?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Dr Sue Hamilton
Sir: With regard to your table on sin, it is not the case that pre-marital sex, homosexual practices and masturbation are considered "not harmful" in Buddhism.
Rather, (lay) Buddhists undertake a precept to "abstain from sexual misconduct", which is open to subjective interpretation (which would, of course, be culturally influenced), the key criterion being harmlessness.
Yours faithfully,
SUE HAMILTON
Lecturer in Indian Religions
King's College, London
London, WC2
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments