Letter: What young people choose to watch

Dr Tim Newburn,Dr Ann Hagell
Friday 15 April 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Chris Holligan (Letters, 14 April) says that for two methodological reasons caution should be exercised when interpreting the results of our research which found that the viewing habits of young offenders and non-offending schoolchildren were remarkably similar.

First, he suggests that the findings may disguise the fact that young offenders may be watching 'more video nasties' than schoolkids of the same age. In fact, the full report contains no evidence that young offenders are watching 'video nasties' at all. Their tastes and viewing habits were notably conservative and mainstream.

Second, he argues that the sensitivity of the subject matter means that our respondents may have concealed their true habits. As professional researchers we took steps to address the matter, including 'lie-detectors' in the questionnaire as well as being very careful to build up rapport with our interviewees.

Our book, Young Offenders and the Media, describes the research methods in detail. Finally, particularly when the topic is one of such importance, and where debate is frequently based on assertion and assumption rather than evidence, we would urge people to read research in the original and exercise caution if they are going to rely on newspapers for their information.

Yours sincerely,

TIM NEWBURN

ANN HAGELL

Social Justice Group

Policy Studies Institute

London, NW1

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in