LETTER : What we should ask of farmers
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Nick Brown
Sir: Drought or no drought, it certainly appears to be a bumper year for arable farmers. We hear that the combined effects of a switch within the Common Agricultural Policy from price support to area payments and the unexpectedly high market price for cereals have led to record profit levels. This, and the devaluation of the green pound, have made arable farming a good business to be in.
Conversely, other sectors of the industry, particularly hill sheep farmers who cannot grow cereals, are in a bad way. For those that have the option, I wonder whether we are now likely to see an upsurge in the conversion of pasture to arable land, more pressure towards intensification, and a further loss of landscape and ecological character.
It is vital that we maintain a vibrant rural economy and a profitable agricultural sector. The countryside would be a very different, and much less diverse and attractive place, without farming. It is right that farmers should have the opportunity to make a living, and a good one, in a profession that requires a combination of technical skill, business acumen, commitment and sheer hard work matched in few others.
But in a sector that receives huge amounts of public funds, the taxpayers must be sure to receive the greatest benefit for their investment. This benefit at present comes predominantly in the form of a secure supply of relatively cheap food.
In an age when, thankfully, we do not go hungry, we are entitled to ask for more. Provision for nature conservation, landscape improvement, reduced pollution - these are all "commodities" that the farmer is in a unique position to provide. They should be recognised much more centrally in the CAP, and incorporated as part of society's return for the financial support it is giving to the industry.
None of this means that farmers need suffer. Subsidy levels can still be set to give a good living, and can certainly be adjusted to give greater assistance to hill farmers.
It is simply a case, as customers, of changing our specification to the supplier and ensuring that we get true value for money and public benefit from public funds.
That, surely, is the order of the day.
Yours sincerely,
Nick Brown
Leamington Spa,
Warwickshire
17 August
The writer is Principal Landscape Conservation Officer, Warwickshire County Council.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments