Letter: What morality demands of the UN
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I agree with the conclusions in the last two paragraphs of your leading article about the United Nations ('The possible and the indefensible', 16 July), but I suggest there is a fourth area in which the UN could and should act and that is in the deployment of troops to protect humanitarian convoys, with a mandate to fire if necessary to force a passage for any convoy whether by land, sea or air. It is wrong that UN troops should be prevented by any local commander (or by crowds of protesting women) from carrying out effective escort duties to force humanitarian aid through to its destination.
This fourth task flows naturally and directly from the first task in your list (the pre-emption of conflict). It is likely that pre-emption will often fail because of the difficulty of judging and agreeing on the moment to intervene. But when conflict has broken out, the forcing through of humanitarian aid is likely to become essential; and if carried out in a determined manner may of itself have some effect on the deployment of heavy weapons and the level of fighting.
It will be objected that 'fighting convoys through' will inevitably lead to the UN troops being drawn into the civil war, against one side or both. It need not be so, provided adequate forces are deployed at the outset and provided the soft option of air action in isolation is not taken.
Yours faithfully,
ANTONY DUFF
London, SW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments