Letter: Welfare on loan
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: You are right, in your leading article, 'Neglect that costs the poor dearly' (15 July), to criticise the Government's failure to reform the Social Fund. But you assert that the failure to implement the changes proposed by the Government's advisers, 'Lilley rejects call to reform Social Fund' (15 July), is a matter of cost. It is more than that. The Social Fund is a tiny part of the benefit scheme - some pounds 340m out of a Social Security budget of pounds 80bn. The reason why the Government refuses to reform the Social Fund is because it introduces the concept of a loan to welfare provision.
The Social Fund means that the state is no longer under a duty to guarantee cash payments, rather it offers temporary help during times of crisis or hardship. This establishes a different relationship between the individual and the state. It lowers expectations. And it fosters 'independence'.
The other aspects of a cash-limited Social Fund: priorities, fixed budgets, targets, which you are critical of, are more a reflection of the Government's method of public-sector management than of any underlying ideology, or way of saving cash.
Once the idea of a 'welfare benefit loan' has become established, the idea of a 'welfare state loan' can be more widely introduced. To an extent this has already happened - the Social Fund loan was introduced in 1988; since 1990 students in further education have been offered loans to 'top-up' their 'frozen' grants. Who next?
Yours faithfully,
JOHN F. PROSSER
London, E17
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments