LETTER:We will not accept monster turbines
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr John S. L. Edwards
Sir: C. B. Moynihan (ex-Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Energy) writes that "The power output of the average wind turbine is set to double in the next few years", but he does not say why. The reason is that the latest turbine proposals are for much larger turbines - there is no magic technological improvement, nor can there be, because the output of wind turbines is directly determined by the swept area of the rotor.
The wind power industry, having gained a few outrageous consents for 300-350 kW turbines over the hills of Wales, Cornwall, the Yorkshire Moors, the Lake District and other beautiful places, is now trying to exploit that precedent by massively increasing the size of turbines.
Here in Gwent, on a beautiful hill above Caerphilly, Mynyddislwyn, there is a planning application by Sir Alfred McAlpine for a "demonstration" 1000 kW turbine that is as high as a 27-storey building and has a rotor with a diameter the size of a 20-storey building. Even if all further wind power stations were allowed to use such monstrous machines, more than 12,000 would still be needed to produce just one-tenth of our annual electricity consumption.
I do not believe the public will ever accept these thousands of turbines, visible on every hill from every hill. In principle, wind power is a good thing and we support it; but the only place where it might be practical in useful amounts is off-shore, well away from low-lying coasts, in shallow waters.
There are plenty such sites where large groups of turbines could be deployed, and this is where the Government ought to be diverting its huge subsidies.
Yours faithfully,
John S. L. Edwards
Vice Chair, Gwent Branch
Campaign for the Protection of
Rural Wales
Onen, Monmouth
17 November
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments