Letter: Way forward on Maastricht
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Douglas Hurd was uncharacteristically clumsy in his pronouncements about Maastricht and the Social Chapter (report, 11 February). Can he really mean that, rather than accept the Social Chapter, Her Majesty's Government would refuse to ratify Maastricht and thus bring the whole treaty crashing down, not only for this country, but also for the rest of the Community?
How would that look to Europe? Would he not hear from every European government and read in every European newspaper that Britain was putting the dubious advantages of a low-paid, underprivileged work-force before honouring its signature to the treaty and its obligations to the rest of Europe? Britain's unpopularity in Europe, already massive, would rise to unprecedented heights, and our membership of the Community would be brought into question.
Actually, the Government has an easy way out of its dilemma. It could say that, much as it dislikes the Social Chapter, nevertheless if there should turn out to be a majority for it in the House of Commons, it would be obliged, as a loyal servant of the House, to accept the House's verdict, however reluctantly, and to try and negotiate with the rest of the Community a cancellation of the British opt-out from the Social Chapter.
In these circumstances it is hard to believe that any Conservative would vote for the Labour amendment, which would then (perhaps unfortunately) be defeated.
Yours,
WILLIAM HAYTER
Stanton St John, Oxfordshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments