LETTER:Water meters: an equitable cure for shortages?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Roger Martin
Sir: To suppose that demand for water (or any other physical thing) can go on increasing indefinitely is childish. Sooner or later, demand management for all finite resources is inevitable; and metering/pricing is the obvious method.
It can be made equitable by the simple technique of two-tier metering; whereby every household gets a basic ration cheap, and then pays heavily for additional units. In an electronic age, the billing process can be very flexible - eg, taking account of the number of people in a household or their special needs.
If only the Environment Act had put an obligation on the key regulators (water and energy) to have regard to the environmental impact of their decisions, we would now be having a more sophisticated debate on water resource policy.
Yours faithfully,
Roger Martin
Director, Somerset Wildlife Trust
Bridgwater, Somerset
22 August
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments