LETTER:Wartime winners
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr John Campbell
Sir: I was sorry to see Andrew Marr (8 February) repeating the myth that women got the vote "because of the violence and courage of the suffragettes". It is not true. The status of the suffragettes as feminist heroines is probably too established to be corrected now; but the truth is that the violence of 1908-14 set back the cause of women's suffrage, alienating supporters such as Lloyd George and Churchill, who believed that the Government could not be seen to yield to terrorism.
Women did not get the vote before 1914. They won it in 1918, with very little controversy, as a result of their participation as munitions workers and nurses in the Great War. It was the vital war work of millions of unsung women, not the counterproductive antics of the suffragettes, that dissolved the opposition to women's votes.
But I fear that history is no match for a popular myth.
Yours faithfully,
John Campbell
London, W11
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments