Letter: Voting system causes apathy
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Ms Caroline Ellis
Sir: Perhaps part of the reason for the public apathy towards party politics (''Party politics turns Britain into an 'apathetic nation' ", 23 November) lies in the fact that political parties increasingly seem to have lost interest in the needs and concerns of the voters.
The first-past-the-post voting system based on the ethos of "to the victor the spoils" militates against any meaningful relationship between the people and the politicians. Under our current voting system, parties are not required to fight hard for every single constituency - apart from the 100-odd marginal seats, the result is a foregone conclusion.
The second feature of the first-past-the-post system is that it discourages political pluralism, with the manifestos of each of the main parties increasingly coming to resemble each other as they fight to occupy the same narrow political ground.
Herein lies part of the reason for the apparent shift towards punitive and authoritarian attitudes to civil rights, since politicians increasingly dare not speak up for people with lifestyles that diverge from "the norm" and fear the consequences of defending basic principles of human rights against populist authoritarianism - the lack of parliamentary opposition to the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act being a recent case in point.
Yours sincerely,
Caroline Ellis
Charter 88
London, EC1
23 November
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments