Letter: Voting for women

Shelagh Diplock
Monday 12 January 1998 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Letter: Voting for women

Sir: Kamlesh Bahl, chair of the Equal Opportunities Commission, gives the impression that the current legislation does not permit mechanisms to ensure equal treatment of men and women in the selection of candidates by political parties (letter, 2 January).

In fact, as she later points out, the reality is that the law is unclear. Following the tribunal case on Labour's all-women shortlists the EOC took further legal advice. Once again they were advised that the selection of party candidates was not subject to the Sex Discrimination Act and was therefore lawful. The most recent Marschall ruling in Europe supports the view that mechanisms to bring about gender balance are permissible under European equal treatment laws.

The Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly are both new bodies and the parties are able to choose mechanisms which ensure that women have an equal chance of being elected. Equal treatment mechanisms such as "zipping" (alternating men and women on a list) and twinned constituencies which select a man and a woman, do not give priority to women over men. However they would prevent the new bodies perpetuating the current male domination of politics.

At present the parties, and the EOC, seem to be worried about the possibility of a challenge to equal treatment selection procedures by a man. If the parties do not adopt these or other mechanisms to ensure women are treated equally there is now an even greater possibility that they will face a case of sex discrimination brought by a woman.

SHELAGH DIPLOCK

Director, The Fawcett Society

London EC2

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in