Letter: Vote counting is a theatrical event

Bob Young
Wednesday 14 May 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: H B Gould (Letters, 10 May), having observed a few clumsy fingers at a count of votes on 1 May, advocates electronic voting.

The UK's antiquated system is both enormously robust and takes place in full view of observers from all the parties. Occasionally a few papers may get into the wrong pile, but if this would have a significant effect on the result, the procedures for a recount ensure that extra checks are carried out.

Each declaration is a valuable theatrical event. The complete process, extending over a night and most of the next day, provides the nation with a memorable experience which has all the excitement of a race. Think of what it would be like if, instead, voters were provided with an on-line keypad on which to vote. The moment the polls closed a computer in each constituency would have all the data needed to declare the local result. The national result could be declared a few nanoseconds later.

But someone would have had to make absolutely sure that no file could be hacked, that the network was in perfect order, that the software had been tested and that all the computers were backed up by stand-by machines. All this would need an investment of tens of millions of pounds - hardly worth it when general elections take place so infrequently.

Let's keep paper voting slips "on the table" and counted in full view.

BOB YOUNG

Brighton, East Sussex

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in