LETTER : Volcanic fire and brimstone

Dr David A. Rothery
Friday 25 August 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Dr David A. Rothery

Sir: The fears among scientists about the possibility of a much bigger volcanic eruption still to come on Monserrat are not that it will "spew deadly lava", as stated in your report (23 August). Lava is rarely deadly. A lava flow may destroy buildings in its path, but it almost always moves slowly, usually advancing on a narrow front, and it can be walked away from.

The real threat to life on Monserrat is of a wide-spread ground-hugging flow of volcanic ash that could be generated by a major explosive eruption. These hot avalanches travel at more than 100km per hour, and it was one of these that obliterated the town of St Pierre, along with its 28,000 inhabitants, on the nearby island of Martinique in 1902.

So far, the most vigorous current activity on Monserrat has been ash thrown a few thousand metres into the air, dispersed by the wind and falling slowly to the ground. An air-fall deposit such as this should not be referred to as an avalanche, because the process of emplacement and the hazard it represents are both quite different. The fine dust in an airfall is a respiratory hazard, if ash is allowed to accumulate thickly on roofs it can cause them to collapse, and it may kill crops and other vegetation.

Yours faithfully,

David A. Rothery

Department of Earth Sciences

The Open University

Milton Keynes

24 August

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in