Letter: Vexed question of dangerous dogs
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: As the veterinary surgeon involved in the defence of Marina Cleland's lurcher dog, I feel it imperative to clarify my position in this and other cases in which I am involved. I am utterly in agreement with the control and eventual eradication of pit-bull terriers, which are fighting machines not suitable for a civilised society.
However, when the horrendous attacks took place in 90/91 we, the public, were constantly shown photographs by the media of dogs I recognised as real pit-bull terriers. Although, in my experience, this type varies widely in height, build and colour (much as do poodles), they all are of a type. This was the type of dog which we, the public, were told to register.
Only one year later, I am involved in the defence of dogs which are only guilty of being short-coated and mongrel. This is a travesty of justice and one which has potentially made criminals of hundreds of thousands of people owning mongrel dogs which have nothing to do with pit-bull terriers in any way, shape or form, or are various crosses of that type.
The Act is specific in referring to the 'type known as the pit-bull terrier'. If we, the public, do not insist that those responsible for administering this law restrict themselves to this type we will be guilty of allowing a genetic witch- hunt of momentous proportion.
Yours faithfully,
A. Y. JONES
London, NW10
26 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments