Letter: VAT anomalies build a burden
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.IF ONLY Dr Fran Dinshaw of St Catherine's was correct in believing that the listing of a building means that VAT is not payable on repairs ('Colleges and schools fear listed building straitjacket', 24 January).
One of the anomalies in the application of VAT to listed buildings is that repairs are 'standard rated' for VAT whereas alterations which have received listed building consent are exempt - an application of the VAT rules which encourages alteration rather than repair.
Despite constant requests from those interested in the preservation of buildings, the Government steadfastly refuses to amend this situation, which would significantly ease the financial burden of repairs on those accepting the responsibility of ownership of a listed building.
Malcolm D Crowder
Association of Preservation
Trusts, Swinton, Manchester
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments