Letter: US flying rights an internal issue
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: A Virgin Atlantic advertisement in your 4 December edition asserts that the right to fly into Britain and pick up passengers then fly on to Europe, is the same as flying to New York and picking up passengers then flying on to Miami. They are two different issues. The second one is called cabotage and is fought against in the UK as much as in the United States
Next, Virgin Atlantic would like us to believe that the US is a protectionist government. Nothing could be further from the truth. The US is very liberal to British carriers investing in US airlines, compared to most other countries.
Finally, Virgin would like the flying public to believe that Virgin Atlantic is protecting them from a merger that is somehow anti-competitive, when they practise the same thing with other US airlines. I think that Mr Branson should just stick to the facts.
MATT PAXTON
Vashon, Washington State,USA
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments