LETTER: US embassy ploy is threat to peace

Mr Rob Kent
Thursday 11 May 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Rob Kent

Sir: Patrick Cockburn is wrong to report that Senator Bob Dole had "hitherto shown little interest in the location of the US embassy in Israel" before introducing his congressional bill to relocate it to Jerusalem ("US embassy plan adds to Jerusalem land row", 10 May). In the past, Senator Dole opposed congressional resolutions giving credence to Israel's claim to Jerusalem as its capital. In 1990, he pointed out that such a motion

declares on an issue that our government - and many outside observers - see as better left to negotiations among the parties involved, rather than decided by unilateral action.

Sadly, Senator Dole is now trying to outflank the most pro-Israel president for decades through a crude appeal to the Zionist lobby.

Unfortunately, international law will be ignored by Israel's supporters in America. However, it forbids the acquisition of territory by force. After the Israeli parliament claimed "Jerusalem, complete and united" as "the capital of Israel" in 1980, UN Security Council Resolution 478 declared the annexation to be illegal.

If American politicians believed that there were votes and campaign contributions in upholding Palestinian rights under international law, the prospects for the peace process would be brighter.

Yours faithfully,

ROB KENT

Birmingham

10 May

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in