Letter: Universities and supermarkets
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Discussion of a 'graduate tax' is confused because the term is used by different people to mean different things. A true graduate tax is levied for life or until retirement. Richer graduates repay more than they have borrowed; in effect, graduates pay a super-tax (Peter Jay, Letters, 25 June).
An entirely different approach is for students to take out a loan for a specified sum; to repay through an addition to their income tax or National Insurance contributions; and for repayment to be 'switched off' once the loan has been repaid. Under this arrangement, no one repays more than they have borrowed. It is not a tax, both because it is voluntary (no one is forced to take out a loan), and because it is directly related to the sum borrowed. All that is happening is that loan repayments are collected in a way that reduces the risk faced by individual students (thereby assisting access) and is administratively cheap.
The great advantage of the second approach is that since repayment is secure, it would be possible for students to borrow from the private sector, producing additional resources for an over-stretched system of higher education at minimal cost to the taxpayer.
Yours faithfully,
NICHOLAS BARR
Department of Economics
London School of Economics
London, WC2
25 June
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments