Letter: Universal truth and oppositional subtlety justify Shakespeare's lasting appeal
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: To have to reply to Howard Brenton's scatter-shot attack on Shakespeare - he charged too much for his seats, was nervous of the establishment, has been too influential on modern writers - is provoking, as his aim so clearly was to annoy rather than illuminate ('Will of the people?', 2 June). But annoyed I am.
The 'universal' truth in Measure for Measure is the evil of tyranny and the powerlessness that its victims feel. There are many countries and people to whom this speaks, and that is precisely its greatness. It is because Shakespeare's work does not depend on interpreting obscure codes and meanings that thousands go to see it - and will continue to do so long after audiences have tired of wading through the historical footnotes to Pravda.
Yours faithfully,
MARY SHARP
London, W9
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments