Letter: Universal truth and oppositional subtlety justify Shakespeare's lasting appeal

Mr R. G. F. Miles
Thursday 03 June 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Howard Brenton plainly does not understand Measure for Measure ('Will of the people?', 2 June). The happy ending may have satisfied James I, but surely most audiences are not taken in by Vincentio's pasting over the cracks?

The play is as oppositional as you can get - the same Duke takes back the reins of power, having proven himself as, if not more, irresponsible than at the outset. This is not King Lear, in which the eponymous hero has recognised his errors, and become a better person before he dies.

Much more realistically, the same old regime is very much alive. It has retained control, having dabbled with the lives of citizens who are powerless to criticise. We leave the theatre with doubts gnawing at our guts.

As Brenton suggests, 'there was no possibility in the 1590s and the 1600s that a play could be in any way oppositional'. Not overtly, perhaps, in a world that lacked the freedoms Brenton enjoys, and in which attacks upon authority had to be handled rather more subtly than he can usually muster. Shakespeare's ironic ending asks us to question the establishment, Viennese and English, ancient and modern.

If I sought to censor plays, I would be far more inclined to have Measure for Measure on my hit list than anything Brenton has written.

Yours faithfully,

R. G. F. MILES

Haileybury,

Hertfordshire

2 June

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in