Letter: Unitary councils: power to central government, loss of the citizen's role and a fight for jobs

Mr Roger Knight
Wednesday 27 April 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The real question of local government in England is whether we need it at all. Eighty per cent of the money spent by councils comes from the Exchequer - the rest being raised by unpopular poll or property taxes. The Government directs most of the activities of councils.

The services you get and the taxes you pay should depend on your needs and means, not on where you happen to live. It is extremely unfair that neighbours pay widely differing taxes because they happen to live on different sides of a borough boundary. Equally, it is wrong that the quality of public services varies from place to place according to the whims and prejudices of councillors.

Moreover, it is an illusion that councils are effective agents of strategic planning. Whitehall sets the parameters; councils only fill in the detail. If communities elect councillors who do not accept government plans for development, local planning decisions are simply overruled on appeal.

Not only is local government a waste of money, it is a smokescreen for central government - which is largely responsible for underfunding of local services and unpopular planning policies. Local government officers would work just as efficiently if they were civil servants.

Local councillors are unnecessary. Without them, democratic accountability would be via the minister and Parliament and the quality of local services would be an issue in general elections - the only elections that either matter or receive much public interest.

Yours faithfully,

ROGER KNIGHT

Cuxton,

Kent

25 April

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in