Letter: Unfair voting system worse than ever
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: There have already been two post-war elections (1951 and 1974) when the party receiving the largest total vote won fewer seats than its rival. An analysis of the 1997 results shows that this potential distortion is now far greater.
The Labour lead nationally was 13 points. A uniform swing of 6.5 per cent from Labour to Conservative, giving an equality of total votes, would nevertheless award Labour 78 more seats than the Tories, and an overall majority of 15. For the Labour and Tory shares of seats to be equal would require a Tory lead of over 6 points, while they would need about a 10- point lead to secure an overall majority.
Regardless of one's political allegiance (and I have always been anti- Tory) this distortion calls for some form of PR before the next election.
ALAN PAVELIN
Chislehurst, Kent
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments