Letter: Unfair to the unconvicted
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The past weeks have seen many misleading and dangerous statements about juvenile crime. However, few have been as depressing as the contention of the Secretary of the Outer London branch of the Justices' Clerks' Society (Letters, 4 March) that juveniles given bail 'receive no incentive to change their ways'.
As Mr Lydiate must know, the vast majority of those given bail have not yet been convicted of any offence. No one, least of all a justices' clerk, is entitled to assume that these defendants' ways need changing. Only when guilt is proved does the law have the right to intervene.
In the few cases where juveniles are committing dozens of offences (and most of the reported stories fall apart under close examination), the public needs to be protected. In some cases, that may require a remand into the existing secure children's homes.
However, there is an overwhelming need to improve the efficiency of court practices, for which justices' clerks hold the primary responsibility. Possibly the most effective way of interrupting the flow of offences is by speeding the time between first appearance and acquittal or conviction, at which point the law becomes entitled to intervene.
Yours sincerely,
ADAM SAMPSON
Deputy Director
Prison Reform Trust
London, N1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments