Letter: Unfair to Hamilton
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your leading article (7 November) is right to point out that Neil Hamilton, although perceived to be unpopular, is entitled to a fair trial. That, he manifestly has not had.
You have little to say, however, about the role of the press in the whole "sleaze" affair. An unrelenting campaign has been waged against Neil Hamilton and his wife, based upon the assumption that he was guilty of corruptly accepting payments from Mr Al Fayed.
Had there been a proper judicial process, Mr Hamilton and Mr Al Fayed would both have had to answer questions on oath and any witnesses could have been cross-examined. Even more important, prejudicial pre-trial publicity would not have been permitted.
MURIEL TURNER
(Baroness Turner of Camden)
London NW6
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments