Letter: Unfair cultural caricatures of Leavis the 'Luddite'

Professor D. F. Pocock
Friday 25 March 1994 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: It is a very sad thing that nearly 16 years after his death F. R. Leavis should still be subject to caricature and misrepresentation. I am referring to the pronounced lack of balance in the sketch of Leavis, compared with C. P. Snow, in the Independent (Section II; 'When the English don went nuclear', 24 March).

Frederic Raphael palters with the truth so successfully that it would take a long letter to correct his account in detail. But it is untrue to say, as Mr Raphael does, that Leavis held that 'the purpose of a humane education was to nurture the moral self-sufficiency necessary to resist, if not prevent, the very technological revolution that Snow advocated' (my emphases).

For Leavis the purpose of education was to foster a kind of intelligence which could diagnose the coarseness of Snow's criteria in setting up his 'two cultures' in the first place. Leavis was profoundly concerned (and, in the light of subsequent events, rightly so) about the moral damage that must result from simple-minded conceptions of what 'literature' and 'science' were 'about' and (I quote from his lecture 'There is only one culture', published in his Nor Shall My Sword) 'to point out these things is not to be a Luddite'.

Yours faithfully,

D. F. POCOCK

Emeritus Professor of

Social Anthropology

Lewes, East Sussex

24 March

(Photograph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in