Letter: UN aid ban was worth backing
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.WHILE FEW welcomed the decision of Sadako Ogata, the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, to cease humanitarian assistance to Bosnia, her action should have been understood in context, and it is unfortunate for her office that she was persuaded to back down.
For years, despite its ostensible humanitarian mandate, the UNHCR has been used as a political tool. Recent history is replete with examples of refugee situations in which the political interests of particular states have taken priority over the UNHCR's mandate to protect and help the victims of an irresponsible state.
For UNHCR to protect refugees, it must be in a position to take independent action on their behalf. If this was her intention, Mrs Ogata's action should have been supported.
B E Harrell-Bond
Refugee Studies Programme
University of Oxford
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments