Letter: Ulster solution cannot be partisan
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Conor Cruise O'Brien ('First remove the offending articles', 11 June) has argued strongly in favour of the deletion of Articles 2 and 3 from the Irish Constitution: articles stating Ireland's claim to the six north-east counties (currently under British control). He reminds us that it is these articles which are keeping Unionist politicians away from the negotiating table.
The flaw in Dr O'Brien's arguments is his exclusive concern with a solution acceptable only to the Unionists. The nationalist population (supporters of either the SDLP or Sinn Fein) is now 40 per cent of the population, and the numbers are rising.
It is wrong for Dr O'Brien to propose a 'solution' based on the assumption that a significant proportion of the community (the nationalists) simply don't count. Moreover, what he is proposing is not a formula for peace, but for further conflict. Articles 2 and 3 of the Irish Constitution reassure Northern nationalists that they are still part of the Irish nation; therefore, in respect of human rights and civil rights, they can look to the Irish government to speak out for them. Once those reassurances are removed, it need surprise no one if the beleaguered nationalist community turns increasingly towards the option of violence.
I am not ignoring the fact that there is not yet a consensus for a united Ireland; however, if you take into account the rights of the nationalist community (who simply cannot be ignored) then it is obvious that neither is there a consensus for a partitioned Ireland. Dr O'Brien's 'solution' is therefore too partisan.
Yours sincerely,
YVONNE HART
London, W11
11 June
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments