LETTER: Trial and error: animals in custody
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Dr Gary Slapper
Sir: It is quite understandable that the cat owner whose beloved pet was savaged to death by a dog is in shock ("Bull terrier arrested for cat killing" 21 August). For over 50 years the law has recognised that severe shock can constitute an "injury". Last year, a man was convicted of grievous bodily harm upon a woman whom he had terrorised with obscene calls over the telephone. The woman had suffered physically (vomiting, diarrhoea etc) through the assault on her mind. The culprit was given a custodial sentence.
If, therefore, a dog, by killing a cat, causes an acute form of post traumatic shock syndrome in the cat's owner, then a legally recognised "injury" has been caused to a person. The Dangerous Dogs Act is then applicable, and the dog can be seized.
Using the law against animals is not a new departure. Many animals accused of killing were tried in Britain under the doctrine of deodand until it was abolished in 1841. Some countries still proceed against animals. On a recent trip to Asia I read, under the newspaper headline "Elephant Slapped with Manslaughter Charge", of the prosecution in New Delhi of an elephant which had trampled a man to death. The first legal wrangle concerned whether the mammal could be granted bail.
Yours faithfully,
Gary Slapper
Stoke-on-Trent,
Staffordshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments