Letter: Tourists stumble into Antarctica

Professor Johanna Laybourn-Parry
Friday 27 September 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Michael Streeter's article on pollution posing a threat to tourism in Antarctica (25th Sept) suggests that all nations mounting scientific programmes are not behaving responsibly. While there are some irresponsible nations, the major players (the British, Australians, Americans and New Zealanders) have operated strict protocols on the handling of waste and pollution for some time.

Tourism is increasing, and does pose problems. Large numbers of tourists invading scientific stations (often uninvited) disrupt scientific programmes during the short Antarctic summer. Hordes trooping across penguin rookeries can reduce the reproductive success of the birds. Unlike scientific personnel, tourists do not undergo rigorous medical tests. If there is a medical emergency on a tourist vessel, it is very likely that a scientific station would be called upon to help.

I have seen inappropriately dressed tourists being ferried around in inflatable boats, often some distance from their tour ship. I wonder who would be expected to undertake search and rescue if (when) an accident occurs.

The scientific community has put its house in order - I think the tour operators need to do some serious thinking.

The revenue from tourism does not benefit Antarctica - none of it is used to support scientific research or to assist in cleaning up the rubbish left by less responsible nations in the past.

Professor JOHANNA LAYBOURN-PARRY

Department of Physiology and Environmental Science

University of Nottingham

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in