Letter: Too many eggs in the tunnel
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Too many eggs
in the tunnel
Sir: Richard Hope writes (letter, 2 December) that it is "laughable" to argue that airlines could not switch capacity to meet demand should the Channel Tunnel be put out of action.
I have before me forecasts, published by Eurotunnel, of passenger rail traffic through the tunnel in the year 2040, with and without the high- speed link. Without the link, through rail services alone are expected to carry 22.5 million passengers a year, and with it 45 million.
Last year, international traffic through Heathrow was 44 million passengers. The question posed by the proposed high-speed link is: how many eggs should be placed in one basket?
JOHN ADAMS
Geography Department
University College London
London WC1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments