Letter: Tobacco hysteria
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Does Professor Terence Morris (letter, 2 March) expect to be taken seriously when he complains of having to pass through a railway smoking carriage? Anti-smoking has become a kind of hysteria in this country. When one sees the effects of air, water and earth pollution caused by far more dangerous substances than tobacco smoke, one cannot help wondering whether smokers are attacked just because they are a weak and easily available target when compared to chemicals manufacturers, power station managers, water companies and the car industry.
If the stonework of ancient churches is crumbling, if waterways are poisoned and vegetation dead in many places, what are the effects of such pollution on the human frame?
The zeal that is expended on bullying smokers could be better directed at more powerful and more dangerous interests.
Yours sincerely,
ANN DUMMETT
Oxford
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments