Letter: Time for another Lib-Lab pact
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.BEN PIMLOTT is right to point to the possibilities of the Newbury by-election for opposition co-
operation ('If only they'd talk a bit more', 7 March). Labour was born in cross-party co-operation with the 1903 Lib-Lab pact. In the inter-war years, there were frequent Lib-Lab agreements and stand-downs which did not prevent Labour entering office in 1924 and 1929. Then came the cross-party anti-Tory candidates at the time of Munich.
Since Labour's 1945 triumph, it has turned its back on this earlier spirit of co-operation. It has become a convention of politics that a national party contests every seat, but if Labour is a radical party, it must question such complacent conventions. Its last triumph was more than 25 years ago when England won the World Cup. The world has changed since then, and Labour has to realise this and act upon it.
Gerry Hassan
Glasgow, Scotland
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments