Letter: Tim Yeo's downfall: exercise of confused standards by the Government
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Considered dispassionately, it does seem hard to justify the political lynching of Tim Yeo.
Why did he have to go? Because he had an affair? This had no bearing on his ability as a minister.
Because the affair outraged public standards of morality? The British public is hardly shocked or traumatised by the news that a public figure has had sex outside marriage.
Because his public comments about single parents are at odds with his private life? The man had a problem in his marriage. He had an affair and a child. But he fought to hold his marriage together and to behave honourably towards the mother of the child. The fact that he had gone through this problem, the fact that he and his wife were still together in their marriage, hardly suggest a disdain for marriage or family life.
It would be a rigid and un- Christian morality that disqualified him from speaking up on behalf of family values on the grounds that he has had problems in his marriage. Would not divorce and final breakdown of the marriage have been a greater failure? Do we equally disqualify those whose marriages have ended in this way?
Yours faithfully,
TERENCE FANE-SAUNDERS
London, W1
6 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments