Letter: Threats from outer space

Jim Mangles
Monday 07 July 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: John Brierley's letter (5 July) warning of a possible disaster in space from the Cassini mission is an example of the sort of scare-mongering that has done so much to give CND a bad name.

The sort of plutonium-powered radioisotope thermoelectric generators (RTG) Cassini carries have been used many dozens of times on Nasa space missions without any release of radioactive materials or loss of life. Two missions with RTGs on board have had serious accidents - one was Apollo 13 - but the RTGs worked exactly as designed.

The plutonium is in the form of a ceramic - plutonium dioxide - which makes the RTG extremely robust and the chances of a significant release of radioactive material under extreme conditions, such as the failure of the launch system or accidental re-entry of the vehicle into the Earth's atmosphere, very much less than one in a million, and then both slight and confined to the immediate vicinity of such an improbable event.

If Mr Brierley wants something to worry about, perhaps he would like to consider what would happen in the distinctly more likely event of a one-mile wide asteroid hitting the Earth, with the probable loss of up to one billion human lives. He might consider how such a catastrophe might be prevented without sending nuclear material, in the shape of nuclear weapons, into space.

JIM MANGLES

Wortham, Norfolk

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in