LETTER: Threat to Madagascar's forests

Paul Hellyer
Thursday 12 January 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Paul Hellyer Sir: Richard D. North's article "Less forest but less poverty, too" (12 January) has the appearance of taking a dispassionate view of Third World development priorities. In fact, it is peppered with half-truths, erroneous assumptionsand speculation.

Andrew Lees and I took months to investigate the issues surrounding the mining by RTZ of the Fort Dauphin region in Madagascar. This research included the views and opinions of locals directly affected and informed outside opinion. It included economic and political issues, together with viable alternatives for the region and the Malagasy government. Speculation that we considered the environment only from a Western perspective - the "redundant orthodoxies" and "ecolonialism" to which Mr North refers - is wholly misguided. Tourism development has tremendous regional potential, would generate local wealth and be sustainable. Mining rules out this option irrevocably. Second-guessing our conclusions is misplaced - Mr North is simply hanging this project on the peg of his own opinions with complete disregard for the facts of the matter.

As family and friends come to terms with their grief, these facts will emerge. Facts such as that the forests in question are remnant littoral forests and unique, not rainforests. Facts that will ridicule Mr North's assertion that 60 miles out of a coastline of 4,000 are expendable - such trite statements would be disavowed by anyone who has visited the region.

Mr North finds the political situation in Madagascar in relation to resolving these issues "mildly reassuring". Let us not turn a blind eye to the complexities and realities of decision-making in a country with a fledgling democracy, little transparency in politics in the absence of a strong press and access to information, and the power of vested interests. Yes, the new democratic government should be supported - supported in making decisions which represent the best overall solutions for their country, not short-term cash-flows and plundering of natural resources for foreign interests.

Yes, it's a real world out there. Let's deal with this from a properly informed perspective as Andrew would have done.

Yours faithfully, PAUL HELLYER London, W11

Paul Hellyer was Andrew Lees's companion on his last project in Madagascar.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in