Letter: Third party right of appeal in public interest
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Concerning your leading article on planning irregularities in north Cornwall (24 November), the Council for the Protection of Rural England does not agree that a carefully defined third party right of appeal against perverse planning decisions would undermine local democracy and create 'a blizzard of Nimbyish challenges'.
A third party right of appeal restricted to specific circumstances, such as when a local authority is approving development on its own land or other development which conflicts with an agreed local or structure plan, would renew public faith in local planning processes, introduce a greater degree of consistency into local decision-making and reinforce the Government's commitment to a plan-led system.
Only a very small proportion of all planning approvals would be open to challenge in this way and it would ensure that the public interest, embodied in structure and local plans agreed after public inquiries and consultation, would be upheld.
A third party right of appeal has been in operation in Ireland and elsewhere for years. The concept was also supported by the House of Commons Environment Committee in 1983/4 and earlier this year by the Welsh Affairs Committee. Such a measure would strengthen local democracy and ensure that the countryside is protected against aberrant local decision-making.
Yours sincerely,
NEIL SINDEN
Assistant Secretary Planning
and Heritage, CPRE
London, SW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments