LETTER : They deserve Dawkins diatribe
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Some of your correspondents (Letters, 11, 13 March) have clearly been annoyed by Richard Dawkins's intemperate diatribe (8 March) against woolly thinking in the name of religion (or anything else). I could understand their annoyance if Professor Dawkins had expressed himself contemptuous of people merely for possessing religious faith, but I do not think he did.
Actually, are we not entitled to be just a little bit contemptuous of people, however eminent in their own fields, who allow themselves to be inveigled into pontificating in public about something they know very little about? Especially if it involves telling other people, some of whom may have studied and thought quite hard about the issue, how to behave?
Professor T J PEDLEY
Gonville and Caius College, Cambridge
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments