Letter: There is nothing healthy about the state of British theatre
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.DAVID BRIERLEY says that "London has 300 theatre companies", which suggests companies where actors work together ("Enter cash, stage left?", Business, 15 March). In fact there are nothing like 300 theatre companies employing actors even on a casual basis. In Britain today there is not a single theatre company that offers permanent employment to actors. There are very few private companies that promote new plays in the West End and it is questionable whether there is any substantial audience for boulevard straight plays. Most of the numerous little off-West End pub theatres cannot even pay actors the Equity minimum wage.
In 1945, there were nearly 100 repertory companies in Britain. Where are they now? It is not just the mass public that has developed amnesia about live theatre and its unique qualities, pleasures and opportunities.
It is a myth that British theatre is healthy. In Germany there are regular companies in most towns. In France, Italy, Spain, and Scandinavia, theatre employs actors properly. But in Britain most people are too geographically remote from a theatre to know any longer what it is to be part of a habitual audience. Pub theatres are tiny, exclusive crumbs of comfort.
Making donations to non-profitable theatre companies tax-deductible will have little impact. Donors will get the tax advantage for their gifts rather than charitable companies being able to claim back the tax - that is all. That change might even make life worse for non-profitable companies since donors are unlikely to increase their generosity sufficiently to make up for the rebates presently obtainable by charities.
Tom Sutcliffe
London SW16
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments