Letter: Theory of evolution is not proved by finch beak 'blips'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: I have no time for creationists, but Jonathan Weiner ('The beak of the finch', 11 July) does nothing to further the Darwinist cause.
So, the number of finches diminished during a drought, and the birds which survived had, on average, larger beaks. This is hardly surprising, as I assume the birds with smaller beaks starved. This is far from suggesting that a new sub-species had evolved. These birds would have carried with them genes allowing smaller beaks, so that this anomaly would not necessarily have continued when conditions improved - hence the other change in beak size in 1983, when the 'blip' in 1977 had ironed itself out and finches with larger beaks found it more difficult to survive in wet conditions.
A main tenet of Darwinist theory is genetic mutations brought on by blind chance. If Mr Weiner is suggesting that blind chance brought about the right kind of beak in 1977 and then in 1983, a trip to the roulette table would be a surprising experience for him. Besides, a true genetic mutation would occur in one individual only, and take years to affect the population at large - if at all. Beak shape and size is presumably somewhat variable in finches, as lip and mouth size is in the human species.
Admittedly, I do not have an answer to how we have such a wide variety of animals on this planet. But nor, I suspect, did Darwin.
Yours faithfully,
PETER WINTER
Droitwich, Worcestershire
11 July
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments