Letter: Theory and reality in business ethics
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your leading article 'Good behaviour pays' (12 January) shows that ethical issues and standards in business demand continuous monitoring. This applies, as you point out, to all industries, and not just to the airline industry which occasioned your comments.
Research in America and Europe demonstrates that although business is not generally corrupt, there are no grounds for complacency. Whether established ethical standards are good enough, clear enough or pay in the long run is far from settled. Our research identifies a gap between 'official' aspirations and reality that varies over time and between industries. The voluntary elements to which you refer do need to be supplemented. The European business ethics movement, which relies on them, has as yet shown no noticeable influence on business behaviour.
Several things are needed if high-standard and efficient business behaviour is seriously sought: supportive and enabling laws, understanding of ethical issues, and understanding of the causes of the gap between official standards and actual practice. Providing supportive legislation, codes, etc, can be no more than fumbling in the dark without knowledge of the real expectations of the 'stakeholders' in the economy.
One constructive proposal has not had the public discussion that it deserves. David Huddy, a chartered accountant and company director, proposed a register in which firms can record their value systems and codes, and in which alleged breaches or problematic areas can be recorded, with official replies.
This has the merit of bringing the 'perfect knowledge' assumptions beloved of economists nearer to reality: no one would have to trade with, work for or invest in any company whose values or practices were unacceptable, and everyone would have the means of finding out what these values and practices were.
Yours sincerely,
JOHN DONALDSON
Chairman
Centre for Service Management Studies
Charvil, Berkshire
14 January
The writer is the author of 'Business Ethics: A European Casebook' (Academic Press, 1992).
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments